In the first two posts in this series, we addressed Copyright concerns raised by Generative AI, primarily at the stage of training the LLM as well as using certain datasets. In the first post, we considered whether storing copyrightable works for training purposes is an infringing reproduction. In the second post, we analyzed whether extracting…
TOPICkle
Interim relief in commercial litigation, especially in the Indian Context, plays a very vital role in ensuring that justice delayed, does not in fact result in justice denied. Such relief is designed to prevent irreparable harm and balance the equities. However, recently, there has been an emerging trend of Pro Tem deposits in Standard Essential…
One of the main challenges faced in litigation in India is delay caused on account of backlog of cases. While many measures have been employed to ensure “speedy disposal” and “early resolution” under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, one significant tool that forces both parties to put all their cards on the table, is the…
The intention of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘IBC’) is to rehabilitate the companies and individuals by way of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (hereinafter referred to as ‘CIRP’). It has been held by plethora of judgments, including M. Suresh Kumar Reddy v. Canara Bank, [Civil Appeal No. 7121 of 2022], that to initiate CIRP,…
On May 7, 2024, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India issued an Order in the case of Indian Medical Association & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.[1], mandating that advertisers and advertising agencies submit a self-declaration before any advertisement is published, aired, or displayed. This Order was passed in the background of the alleged…
Most cases filed against AI software have focused on copyright claims. However, the case of Lehrman v. Lovo Inc (“Lovo Case”) offers a fresh perspective by invoking New York Civil Rights Law, Deceptive Practices Law, False Advertising Law and claims under Unfair Competition and False Affiliation, Unjust Enrichment, Tortious interference with advantageous business relationships, and…
The Draft Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2023 (Draft Rules[i]) published in August 2023 proposes amendments to several critical aspects of patent prosecution before the Indian Patent Office. One such aspect is the obligation on a patent applicant to file information about corresponding foreign patent applications within prescribed timeline as per Section 8 of the Patents Act, 1970.…
The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (“MoHFW”) on 31.05.2023 had notified the Amendment Rules, 2023[i] under the COTPA[ii]. These Rules came into force from 01.09.2023. The Amendment Rules, 2023 aims to amend the COTPA Rules, 2004[iii] and thus added Rule11 i.e. “Health spots, message and disclaimer in online curated contents of tobacco products by…
This article discusses the power of the court to modify the arbitral award under the Arbitration Act 1940 (erstwhile act) and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the present Act). The erstwhile act provided three kinds of remedies against arbitral awards, namely, remission, rectification and setting aside of the arbitral award.…
Introduction.
Determining patent infringement is a two-step process. First, the claims must be properly construed to determine their scope and meaning. Second, the claims, as properly construed, must be compared to the accused device.[i]
Literal infringement may be found if an accused device or method falls entirely within the scope of the asserted claims once…

